Skip to main content
Preview

Research from Friday’s close · next update overnight after Monday’s close

Top-7 archive
APH

APH Research brief

Amphenol

Adjusted close as of 2026-10-30
$79.30(−3.39%)

Sagehood’s view on APH

Amphenol · Research 2026-10-30 · Accepted

Research score

56Neutral50 is balancedScore change −4 since 2026-10-29, from 60 to 56; view unchanged at Neutral. Compare the two recordsConfidence 49 · It is not a calibrated probability of investment success.Confidence across the 100 names in this research run: 45 to 70, median 55.
How to read this score

In Sagehood30 · book 2026-10-30In the current Top-7 book

Dated research brief

WhyAmphenol's accelerating revenue and strong long-term channel support a neutral view, because revenue rose 57.6% to $33,047 million with operating margin at 27.7%. The unresolved risk is cash conversion, which at 0.86 trails the 1.01 sector median.
What argues against this viewThe strongest case against the neutral stance is that the earnings beat and crowd onset could extend the advance. Net tone is 0.23 with 9 good-news days followed by outperformance and zero good-news days followed by underperformance, news-attention z-score of 2.42 clears the 2.0 surge mark, and price holds $76.37 support on five touches.
Break conditionFrom the financial specialist: A later reading showing trailing-twelve-month free cash flow conversion below the 1.01 sector free-cash-flow-conversion median would break the cash-quality claim.Tests that specialist’s reading, not this page’s whole Neutral view.

Sagehood does not check this condition automatically. See research limitations below.

Valuation range

No model fair value for this run

Cash-flow model unavailable: the recorded total debt, net debt are missing or invalid. Other valuation methods retain their own checks.

Peer-implied median $68.75 from 3 peer-median multiples. Those medians include figures from another company that are withheld on its own page; see “Valuation & peers”.

Against peers

Information Technology
MultipleAPHGroup medianPercentile
P/E (TTM)34.48×29.89×54th
P/S6.19×7.08×44th
P/B11.95×8.30×64th
FCF yield2.5%2.61%44th
Score details & research limitations9 unavailable fields
Conditions Sagehood can check on its ownNot available in this run. A written break condition is not an automated check; this run does not provide a source-linked rule Sagehood can verify on its own.

Where the break condition comes from: Sagehood research took this condition from the financial specialist. It tests that specialist’s own reading, so it does not say everything that would change this page’s Neutral view.

How to read this research

The score expresses the published research view. 50 is balanced.

Bullish, Neutral or Bearish beside the score is the direction of that view, set by the research from the score: 65 and above is Bullish, 45 to 64 Neutral, 44 and below Bearish.

Confidence is how well the evidence supports this view, not which way it points: Sagehood research is asked to keep it no higher than its most confident specialist, and lower when the specialists disagree or much of the evidence is weak. It is not a calibrated probability of investment success.

Source verification checks the identity and origin of evidence. It does not prove that a claim is correct or that an investment will succeed.

Valuation estimates depend on their inputs and assumptions. They are not guaranteed future prices.

Retrospective research looks back at an earlier period. It is not a verified record of a decision made then using only information available then.

Unavailable is not zero. Read the adjacent reason: information may be missing, unverified or deliberately withheld.

How Sagehood works

The session this view is fixed to

Close$79.30 on 2026-10-30, as the research recorded it
Change on the day−3.39%
First eligible market session2026-11-02

Recorded score context

Specialist source coverage8 of 10 specialists have a verified source on this run. 2 do not.
Score reconciliationThe 8 specialist contributions shown add up to the weighted starting point this score was built from.
Change since the last accepted run60 on 2026-10-29 → 56 on 2026-10-30 (−4 points). This is simple arithmetic between the two published scores, not an explanation of the change.
The run this is compared withResearch of 2026-10-29

Not in this run: Run-specific score definition, Confidence band, Horizon, Why the score changed, Today's unexplained move and Blockers.

What this was built from

Filing cited in the evidenceNot recorded on this card. The newest filing on record is under Key financials, and recent filings are listed under SEC filings.
Peer set27 names in Information Technology, listed with how they were chosen under “Valuation & peers”. The valuation range shows the peer-implied median from 3 peer-median multiples.

Not in this run: Company profile date and Standing disclosure.

Not available in this run

9 fields are unavailable. Each is identified with its reason above; missing information is not zero or a negative research signal.

Price context

· adjusted close $79.30

−3.8% from 2026-06-25

Recent price-basis check: 2026-10-02 to 2026-10-30 (20 sessions). Economic comparability outside this window remains unchecked.

APH adjusted close
Adjusted price · USD · viewing 2026-06-25 to 2026-10-30

Selected 2026-10-30. APH adjusted close. Continuous series. $79.30 US dollars.

90 daily adjusted-price observations through 2026-10-30, ending at the 2026-10-30 research date. The final point is a dated final close. Shown for context, not point-in-time research evidence: the research used the prices recorded with it.

Use the arrow keys on the chart to step through observations.

Published score history

2026-07-23 to 2026-10-30 · 24 publications

Each point is a verified published score. The line breaks where the research method changed (2 methods, numbered in the order they were first used), so scores are not joined across methods. Hollow points were published after their decision window (retrospective).

Every published score and confidence
Research dateScoreViewConfidenceMethod
2026-10-3056Neutral49Method 2
2026-10-2960Neutral62Method 2
2026-10-2854Neutral49Method 2
2026-10-2752Neutral45Method 2
2026-10-2650Neutral49Method 2
2026-10-2350Neutral45Method 2
2026-10-2247Neutral50Method 2
2026-10-2153Neutral45Method 2
2026-10-1652Neutral55Method 2
2026-10-0955Neutral45Method 2
2026-10-0756Neutral58Method 2
2026-10-0255Neutral58Method 2
2026-10-0155Neutral60Method 2
2026-09-3052Neutral52Method 2
2026-09-2952Neutral55Method 2
2026-09-2853Neutral60Method 2
2026-09-2552Neutral60Method 2
2026-09-24 · retrospective52Neutral65Method 2
2026-09-2352Neutral65Method 2
2026-09-1850Neutral70Method 2
2026-09-16 · retrospective50Neutral60Method 2
2026-09-09 · retrospective54Neutral58Method 2
2026-09-0458Neutral75Method 2
2026-07-2352Neutral52Method 1

Specialists

8 of 10 published specialist analyses are available.

Each specialist’s view is shown as the published research recorded it; supporting detail appears only when it was recorded with that same view.

2 unavailable

APH research

Financial specialist

Showing Financial specialist result.

Financial specialist

Evaluated for this session

Bullish

Amphenol grew trailing-twelve-month revenue 57.6% to $33,047 million with the latest quarter up 65.1%, expanded operating margin by 3.4 points to 27.7%, and converted 0.86 of net income into $5,121 million free cash flow.

Full analyst note

What the specialist sees

Evidence: trailing-twelve-month revenue was $33,047 million with 57.6% growth, trailing-twelve-month free cash flow was $5,121 million at 0.86 conversion, and the latest quarter's revenue grew 65.1%.

Why it matters now

Accelerating revenue growth with expanding gross and operating margins supports rising profitability, though free cash flow conversion of 0.86 trails the sector median.

What could change the view

Countercase: Debt and net-debt-to-EBITDA figures are not available, and goodwill is 103.3% of equity, so leverage and balance-sheet quality cannot be fully assessed. Falsifier: A later reading showing trailing-twelve-month free cash flow conversion below the 1.01 sector free-cash-flow-conversion median would break the cash-quality claim.

Specialist score details
Specialist score
65
Evidence confidence
70
Base weight for this role
0.13
Base weight × confidence
9.10
Weight in the score (the chip's weight)
0.18
Weighted contribution
11.61
Business driver
Amphenol grew trailing-twelve-month revenue 57.6% to $33,047 million with the latest quarter up 65.1%, expanded operating margin by 3.4 points to 27.7%, and converted 0.86 of net income into $5,121 million free cash flow.
Mechanism
Accelerating revenue growth with expanding gross and operating margins supports rising profitability, though free cash flow conversion of 0.86 trails the sector median.
Countercase
Debt and net-debt-to-EBITDA figures are not available, and goodwill is 103.3% of equity, so leverage and balance-sheet quality cannot be fully assessed.
Contributions & coverage details

Specialist contributions

Each specialist’s recorded numbers, in the usual specialist order, as recorded: nothing is re-ranked or recalculated. Weights and contributions show two decimals; hover for the exact value.

Financial specialist

Bullish

Score
65
Evidence confidence
70
Weight in the score
0.18
Weighted contribution
11.61

Risk specialist

Neutral

Score
45
Evidence confidence
65
Weight in the score
0.10
Weighted contribution
4.59

Sector specialist

Neutral

Score
50
Evidence confidence
62
Weight in the score
0.12
Weighted contribution
6.08

SEC filings specialist

Neutral

Score
50
Evidence confidence
55
Weight in the score
0.03
Weighted contribution
1.62

News specialist

Neutral

Score
62
Evidence confidence
60
Weight in the score
0.13
Weighted contribution
8.03

Price-trend specialist

Neutral

Score
60
Evidence confidence
65
Weight in the score
0.26
Weighted contribution
15.31

Valuation specialist

Neutral

Score
50
Evidence confidence
30
Weight in the score
0.09
Weighted contribution
4.71

Economy specialist

Neutral

Score
51
Evidence confidence
55
Weight in the score
0.09
Weighted contribution
4.40

Published specialist analyses unavailable: Geopolitics specialist, Social-media specialist. No specialist result is inferred.

  • Geopolitics specialist: This specialist had no checked public source on this run, so no source-backed analysis is shown.
  • Social-media specialist: This specialist had no checked public source on this run, so no source-backed analysis is shown.

How this insight was formed

Each specialist view shown here is checked against the published research files. Sagehood research combined those views into the one Research Score above.

Evidence & method

Inspect the reasoning, source records and valuation behind this dated view.

Sagehood research reasoningSpecialist reasoning, selected statements and filing context
Accepted publication2026-10-30 researchNext eligible session 2026-11-02point-in-time

APH: Sagehood research reasoning

Accepted research score

56

Neutral50 is balanced
Lead specialist in the research decision:

Financial specialist

Bullish

Specialist score 65Evidence confidence 70
What the specialist sees

Amphenol grew trailing-twelve-month revenue 57.6% to $33,047 million with the latest quarter up 65.1%, expanded operating margin by 3.4 points to 27.7%, and converted 0.86 of net income into $5,121 million free cash flow.

Why it matters

Accelerating revenue growth with expanding gross and operating margins supports rising profitability, though free cash flow conversion of 0.86 trails the sector median.

What argues against it

Debt and net-debt-to-EBITDA figures are not available, and goodwill is 103.3% of equity, so leverage and balance-sheet quality cannot be fully assessed.

This specialist’s break condition: A later reading showing trailing-twelve-month free cash flow conversion below the 1.01 sector free-cash-flow-conversion median would break the cash-quality claim.

How the score was formed

The specialists’ weighted starting point was 56.36. Sagehood research’s adjustment was −0.36. 60 on 2026-10-29 → 56 on 2026-10-30 (−4 points). This is simple arithmetic between the two published scores, not an explanation of the change.

Evidence Sagehood research weighed

These selected claims are evidence Sagehood research weighed, not a reconstruction of the numeric adjustment.

Claims as this research published them. Sagehood confirms each claim and its support were published together with this research. That is not an independent check, and it does not prove the claim is accurate or predict future performance.

  1. Financial specialist

    Same statement as under “What the specialist sees” above.

  2. News specialist

    Material-news net tone of 0.23 with 9 good-news days followed by outperformance and zero good-news days followed by underperformance, plus an 8-K on 2026-10-28 and news-attention z-score of 2.42, make the earnings-beat flow the dominant positive driver.

  3. Price-trend specialist

    5-year log-channel +42.8%/yr (fit R² 0.90), +5.4% over 200-day average; holding $76.37 support (5 touches); wave-4 pullback in primary impulse; 14-week RSI 51.4; view breaks below $72.03.

Sagehood research decision

The investment case, main risk and break condition are the ones shown under Sagehood’s view at the top of this page.

Recorded break condition
Break condition as kept in the decision trail

A later reading showing TTM free cash flow conversion below the 1.01 sector free-cash-flow-conversion median would break the cash-quality claim.

Evidence & sourcesClaim-support availability, filing-context links and research method

APH: This run has no checked links from its claims to their evidence. The specialists’ writing is shown as recorded, and no missing evidence is filled in.

Accepted research

Research dated 2026-10-30.

How this research was made

This research is AI-generated and is not investment advice.

Research date
2026-10-30
Valuation & peersInput limits notedFair-value cells, peer multiples and the inputs behind the range

Cash-flow model unavailable

Against the 2026-10-30 close of $79.30 (recorded)

Fundamentals reference date: 2026-09-30.

Cash-flow model unavailable: the recorded total debt, net debt are missing or invalid. Other valuation methods retain their own checks.

Implied by the median of 3 peer-median multiples: $68.75 (−13.3% vs close)

Peers: the 27 Liquid 100 names in Information Technology that this run priced. Companies outside the Liquid 100 are not in the set.

The 27 names

AAPL, AMD, AVGO, CRM, CRWD, CSCO, DELL, GEN, GLW, HPE, HPQ, INTC, KLAC, LRCX, MCHP, MRVL, MSFT, MU, NOW, NVDA, ON, ORCL, PLTR, QCOM, SMCI, SNDK, WDC.

Multiples against the peer group

Information Technology · 27 companies in the group

Sector median includes AVGO, whose per-share figure failed the share-basis check in this research.

  • Price to earnings (trailing twelve months)34.48×

    Peer median 29.89× · middle half 19.24× to 49.15× · 54th percentile of the group

  • Price to sales6.19×

    Peer median 7.08× · middle half 4.55× to 12.88× · 44th percentile of the group

  • Price to book11.95×

    Peer median 8.30× · middle half 6.41× to 15.99× · 64th percentile of the group

  • Free cash flow yield2.5%

    Peer median 2.61% · middle half 1.33% to 5.43% · 44th percentile of the group

This run declares Enterprise value to EBITDA and computes no value for it, for this company or for its peer group.

Evidence limits: 13 valuation inputs required conservative handling: another valuation input required conservative handling; total debt was unavailable; depreciation and amortization were available but not used because this version does not compute an EV/EBITDA multiple; debt coverage was incomplete.

Includes the currently displayed specialist or comparison, not every specialist. Dates and limitations remain attached.

Sagehood research is for general information. It is not individualized investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

Amphenol (APH) research | Sagehood