Skip to main content
Preview

Research from Friday’s close · next update overnight after Monday’s close

Sagehood30
PLTR

PLTR Research brief

Palantir Technologies

Adjusted close as of 2026-10-30
$184.11(−6.27%)

Sagehood’s view on PLTR

Palantir Technologies · Research 2026-10-30 · Accepted

Research score

54Neutral50 is balancedScore change −4 since 2026-10-29, from 58 to 54; view unchanged at Neutral. Compare the two recordsConfidence 65 · It is not a calibrated probability of investment success.Confidence across the 100 names in this research run: 45 to 70, median 55.
How to read this score

In Sagehood30 · book 2026-10-30

Dated research brief

WhyPLTR looks neutral because growth is exceptional but the valuation and tape are extreme. The unresolved risk is that the peer-implied median of $31.56 sits 82.9% below the $184.11 close.This view cites the peer-multiple estimate, which this page does not show. See Valuation & peers.
What argues against this viewThe strongest case against the neutral view is that the peer-implied median of $31.56 sits 82.9% below the $184.11 close.
Break conditionFrom the financial specialist: A later reading showing trailing-twelve-month revenue growth below the threshold of 0 would break the growth claim, since the current figure is 78.9%.Tests that specialist’s reading, not this page’s whole Neutral view.

Sagehood does not check this condition automatically. See research limitations below.

Valuation range

No model fair value for this run

Cash-flow model unavailable: the recorded total debt, net debt are missing or invalid. Other valuation methods retain their own checks.

The peer-multiple estimate is not shown: the close is 5.8 times the estimate.

Against peers

Information Technology
MultiplePLTRGroup medianPercentile
P/E (TTM)157.36×29.89×96th
P/S76.89×6.59×100th
P/B48.43×8.30×96th
FCF yield0.71%2.61%11th

Those medians include figures from another company that are withheld on its own page; see “Valuation & peers”.

Score details & research limitations9 unavailable fields
Conditions Sagehood can check on its ownNot available in this run. A written break condition is not an automated check; this run does not provide a source-linked rule Sagehood can verify on its own.

Where the break condition comes from: Sagehood research took this condition from the financial specialist. It tests that specialist’s own reading, so it does not say everything that would change this page’s Neutral view.

How to read this research

The score expresses the published research view. 50 is balanced.

Bullish, Neutral or Bearish beside the score is the direction of that view, set by the research from the score: 65 and above is Bullish, 45 to 64 Neutral, 44 and below Bearish.

Confidence is how well the evidence supports this view, not which way it points: Sagehood research is asked to keep it no higher than its most confident specialist, and lower when the specialists disagree or much of the evidence is weak. It is not a calibrated probability of investment success.

Source verification checks the identity and origin of evidence. It does not prove that a claim is correct or that an investment will succeed.

Valuation estimates depend on their inputs and assumptions. They are not guaranteed future prices.

Retrospective research looks back at an earlier period. It is not a verified record of a decision made then using only information available then.

Unavailable is not zero. Read the adjacent reason: information may be missing, unverified or deliberately withheld.

How Sagehood works

The session this view is fixed to

Close$184.11 on 2026-10-30, as the research recorded it
Change on the day−6.27%
First eligible market session2026-11-02

Recorded score context

Specialist source coverage8 of 10 specialists have a verified source on this run. 2 do not.
Score reconciliationThe 8 specialist contributions shown add up to the weighted starting point this score was built from.
Change since the last accepted run58 on 2026-10-29 → 54 on 2026-10-30 (−4 points). This is simple arithmetic between the two published scores, not an explanation of the change.
The run this is compared withResearch of 2026-10-29

Not in this run: Run-specific score definition, Confidence band, Horizon, Why the score changed, Today's unexplained move and Blockers.

What this was built from

Filing cited in the evidenceNot recorded on this card. The newest filing on record is under Key financials, and recent filings are listed under SEC filings.
Peer set27 names in Information Technology, listed with how they were chosen under “Valuation & peers”. The valuation range says why the peer-multiple estimate is not shown.

Not in this run: Company profile date and Standing disclosure.

Not available in this run

9 fields are unavailable. Each is identified with its reason above; missing information is not zero or a negative research signal.

Price context

· adjusted close $184.11

+71.6% from 2026-06-25

Recent price-basis check: 2026-10-02 to 2026-10-30 (20 sessions). Economic comparability outside this window remains unchecked.

PLTR adjusted close
Adjusted price · USD · viewing 2026-06-25 to 2026-10-30

Selected 2026-10-30. PLTR adjusted close. Continuous series. $184.11 US dollars.

90 daily adjusted-price observations through 2026-10-30, ending at the 2026-10-30 research date. The final point is a dated final close. Shown for context, not point-in-time research evidence: the research used the prices recorded with it.

Use the arrow keys on the chart to step through observations.

Published score history

2026-07-23 to 2026-10-30 · 37 publications

Each point is a verified published score. The line breaks where the research method changed (4 methods, numbered in the order they were first used), so scores are not joined across methods. Hollow points were published after their decision window (retrospective).

Every published score and confidence
Research dateScoreViewConfidenceMethod
2026-10-3054Neutral65Method 4
2026-10-2958Neutral55Method 4
2026-10-2860Neutral50Method 4
2026-10-2760Neutral55Method 4
2026-10-2661Neutral60Method 4
2026-10-2358Neutral55Method 4
2026-10-2258Neutral60Method 4
2026-10-2162Neutral60Method 4
2026-10-1650Neutral55Method 4
2026-10-0962Neutral55Method 4
2026-10-0757Neutral55Method 4
2026-10-0252Neutral55Method 4
2026-10-0160Neutral58Method 4
2026-09-3052Neutral55Method 4
2026-09-2960Neutral80Method 4
2026-09-2860Neutral65Method 4
2026-09-2561Neutral62Method 4
2026-09-24 · retrospective62Neutral58Method 4
2026-09-2362Neutral62Method 4
2026-09-1862Neutral55Method 4
2026-09-16 · retrospective55Neutral52Method 4
2026-09-09 · retrospective56Neutral62Method 4
2026-09-0450Neutral60Method 4
2026-09-01 · retrospective52Neutral50Method 4
2026-08-31 · retrospective54Neutral63Method 3
2026-08-2854Neutral63Method 3
2026-08-26 · retrospective53Neutral63Method 3
2026-08-24 · retrospective52Neutral63Method 3
2026-08-20 · retrospective52Neutral63Method 3
2026-08-19 · retrospective53Neutral63Method 3
2026-08-1454Neutral63Method 2
2026-08-1353Neutral63Method 1
2026-08-0752Neutral63Method 1
2026-08-0650Neutral63Method 1
2026-08-0450Neutral63Method 1
2026-07-3139Bearish65Method 1
2026-07-2336Bearish47Method 1

Specialists

8 of 10 published specialist analyses are available.

Each specialist’s view is shown as the published research recorded it; supporting detail appears only when it was recorded with that same view.

2 unavailable

PLTR research

Financial specialist

Showing Financial specialist result.

Financial specialist

Evaluated for this session

Bullish

Palantir's revenue grew 78.9% trailing twelve months against the 23.1% sector revenue-growth median, with operating margin of 42.8% and $3,358 million of trailing-twelve-month free cash flow on $6,156 million of revenue. Leverage comparisons are not available.

Full analyst note

What the specialist sees

Evidence: trailing-twelve-month revenue was $6,156 million with 78.9% growth against the 23.1% sector revenue-growth median, trailing-twelve-month free cash flow was $3,358 million on $3,400 million of operating cash flow, and operating margin was 42.8%.

Why it matters now

Revenue growth of 78.9% and operating margin of 42.8% show the business scaling, while free cash flow of $3,358 million on $3,400 million of operating cash flow funds it; the missing total-debt and net-debt-to-EBITDA comparisons leave leverage unconfirmed.

What could change the view

Countercase: Total debt and net debt to EBITDA are not available, so the balance-sheet read rests on cash alone, and the 10-Q filed on 2026-08-04 is not yet reflected in these facts. Falsifier: A later reading showing trailing-twelve-month revenue growth below the threshold of 0 would break the growth claim, since the current figure is 78.9%.

Specialist score details
Specialist score
73
Evidence confidence
50
Base weight for this role
0.13
Base weight × confidence
6.50
Weight in the score (the chip's weight)
0.14
Weighted contribution
10.39
Business driver
Trailing-twelve-month revenue was $6,156 million with 78.9% growth against the 23.1% sector revenue-growth median, trailing-twelve-month free cash flow was $3,358 million on $3,400 million of operating cash flow, and operating margin was 42.8%.
Mechanism
Revenue growth of 78.9% and operating margin of 42.8% show the business scaling, while free cash flow of $3,358 million on $3,400 million of operating cash flow funds it; the missing total-debt and net-debt-to-EBITDA comparisons leave leverage unconfirmed.
Countercase
Total debt and net debt to EBITDA are not available, so the balance-sheet read rests on cash alone, and the 10-Q filed on 2026-08-04 is not yet reflected in these facts.
Contributions & coverage details

Specialist contributions

Each specialist’s recorded numbers, in the usual specialist order, as recorded: nothing is re-ranked or recalculated. Weights and contributions show two decimals; hover for the exact value.

Financial specialist

Bullish

Score
73
Evidence confidence
50
Weight in the score
0.14
Weighted contribution
10.39

Risk specialist

Bearish

Score
30
Evidence confidence
55
Weight in the score
0.10
Weighted contribution
2.89

Sector specialist

Neutral

Score
60
Evidence confidence
55
Weight in the score
0.12
Weighted contribution
7.22

SEC filings specialist

Neutral

Score
50
Evidence confidence
58
Weight in the score
0.04
Weighted contribution
1.90

News specialist

Neutral

Score
48
Evidence confidence
45
Weight in the score
0.11
Weighted contribution
5.20

Price-trend specialist

Neutral

Score
55
Evidence confidence
65
Weight in the score
0.28
Weighted contribution
15.65

Valuation specialist

Neutral

Score
50
Evidence confidence
30
Weight in the score
0.11
Weighted contribution
5.25

Economy specialist

Neutral

Score
52
Evidence confidence
60
Weight in the score
0.11
Weighted contribution
5.46

Published specialist analyses unavailable: Geopolitics specialist, Social-media specialist. No specialist result is inferred.

  • Geopolitics specialist: This specialist had no checked public source on this run, so no source-backed analysis is shown.
  • Social-media specialist: This specialist had no checked public source on this run, so no source-backed analysis is shown.

How this insight was formed

Each specialist view shown here is checked against the published research files. Sagehood research combined those views into the one Research Score above.

Evidence & method

Inspect the reasoning, source records and valuation behind this dated view.

Sagehood research reasoningSpecialist reasoning, selected statements and filing context
Accepted publication2026-10-30 researchNext eligible session 2026-11-02point-in-time

PLTR: Sagehood research reasoning

Accepted research score

54

Neutral50 is balanced
Lead specialist in the research decision:

Financial specialist

Bullish

Specialist score 73Evidence confidence 50
What the specialist sees

Trailing-twelve-month revenue was $6,156 million with 78.9% growth against the 23.1% sector revenue-growth median, trailing-twelve-month free cash flow was $3,358 million on $3,400 million of operating cash flow, and operating margin was 42.8%.

Why it matters

Revenue growth of 78.9% and operating margin of 42.8% show the business scaling, while free cash flow of $3,358 million on $3,400 million of operating cash flow funds it; the missing total-debt and net-debt-to-EBITDA comparisons leave leverage unconfirmed.

What argues against it

Total debt and net debt to EBITDA are not available, so the balance-sheet read rests on cash alone, and the 10-Q filed on 2026-08-04 is not yet reflected in these facts.

This specialist’s break condition: A later reading showing trailing-twelve-month revenue growth below the threshold of 0 would break the growth claim, since the current figure is 78.9%.

How the score was formed

The specialists’ weighted starting point was 53.97. Sagehood research’s adjustment was +0.03. 58 on 2026-10-29 → 54 on 2026-10-30 (−4 points). This is simple arithmetic between the two published scores, not an explanation of the change.

Evidence Sagehood research weighed

These selected claims are evidence Sagehood research weighed, not a reconstruction of the numeric adjustment.

Claims as this research published them. Sagehood confirms each claim and its support were published together with this research. That is not an independent check, and it does not prove the claim is accurate or predict future performance.

  1. Financial specialist

    Same statement as under “What the specialist sees” above.

  2. Risk specialist

    PLTR shows twenty-day annualized volatility 49.2% versus sixty-day annualized volatility 49.0% with volatility trend stable, drawdown from the one-year high −11.9% against maximum one-year drawdown −48.2%, one-year large daily-move count 55, SPY beta 2.02 with downside beta 1.5, and days to earnings 3.

  3. Valuation specialist

    Trailing-twelve-month revenue is $6,156 million with 78.9% year-over-year growth and a 54.6% FCF margin, while the price-to-book of 48.43 sits at the 96th percentile of the Information Technology peer set.

Sagehood research decision

The investment case, main risk and break condition are the ones shown under Sagehood’s view at the top of this page.

Recorded break condition
Break condition as kept in the decision trail

A later reading showing TTM revenue growth below the threshold of 0 would break the growth claim, since the current figure is 78.9%.

Evidence & sourcesClaim-support availability, filing-context links and research method

PLTR: This run has no checked links from its claims to their evidence. The specialists’ writing is shown as recorded, and no missing evidence is filled in.

Accepted research

Research dated 2026-10-30.

How this research was made

This research is AI-generated and is not investment advice.

Research date
2026-10-30
Valuation & peersInput limits notedFair-value cells, peer multiples and the inputs behind the range

Cash-flow model unavailable

Against the 2026-10-30 close of $184.11 (recorded)

Fundamentals reference date: 2026-06-30.

Cash-flow model unavailable: the recorded total debt, net debt are missing or invalid. Other valuation methods retain their own checks.

The peer-multiple estimate is not shown: the close is 5.8 times the estimate.

Peers: the 27 Liquid 100 names in Information Technology that this run priced. Companies outside the Liquid 100 are not in the set.

The 27 names

AAPL, AMD, APH, AVGO, CRM, CRWD, CSCO, DELL, GEN, GLW, HPE, HPQ, INTC, KLAC, LRCX, MCHP, MRVL, MSFT, MU, NOW, NVDA, ON, ORCL, QCOM, SMCI, SNDK, WDC.

Multiples against the peer group

Information Technology · 27 companies in the group

Sector median includes AVGO, whose per-share figure failed the share-basis check in this research.

  • Price to earnings (trailing twelve months)157.36×

    Peer median 29.89× · middle half 19.24× to 45.53× · 96th percentile of the group

  • Price to sales76.89×

    Peer median 6.59× · middle half 4.55× to 11.36× · 100th percentile of the group

  • Price to book48.43×

    Peer median 8.30× · middle half 6.41× to 15.04× · 96th percentile of the group

  • Free cash flow yield0.71%

    Peer median 2.61% · middle half 1.75% to 5.43% · 11th percentile of the group

This run declares Enterprise value to EBITDA and computes no value for it, for this company or for its peer group.

Evidence limits: 12 valuation inputs required conservative handling: another valuation input required conservative handling; no full-year shares-outstanding figure was filed; total debt was unavailable; depreciation and amortization were available but not used because this version does not compute an EV/EBITDA multiple; debt coverage was incomplete.

Includes the currently displayed specialist or comparison, not every specialist. Dates and limitations remain attached.

Sagehood research is for general information. It is not individualized investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

Palantir Technologies (PLTR) research | Sagehood